I answered a follow up question (regarding my comments in the Question and Answer part of the Feb. 21, 2008 “Google Lunar X PRIZE” News Conference) on March 6, 2008 in another forum:
<http://spacefellowship.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=1155&start=225>. That question asked for a time frame for the Ultralight Manned Lunar missions I mentioned at the Google Press Conference. Following a copy of that response, I detail the present status of the Micro-Space hardware we intend to use for those flights.
The time frame for Human Moon Missions, using Micro-Space hardware, is two to four years (subject to funding). Keep in mind that our planned "Deep Space" missions are all feasible with existing launch vehicles, although I often use cost estimates based on SpaceX promises.
About 70% of these mission costs will be for "Freight" service to LEO, with 30% or less for development, integration and production of customized spaceflight hardware.
The simplest, and nearest term Lunar flight would be simply circumlunar, allowing the next man, or first woman to travel around the Moon - the first such event this century and the first in more than 30 years. Micro-Space has many of the components required for this system in stock.
The most spectacular would be a solo human Moon landing. This would use many of the systems from the circumlunar craft and add a version of our Crusader HTS (Human Transport System) Lunar Lander, which itself uses many components we have in stock. This is the same lander we will use for the Google Lunar X PRIZE, and are actually preparing for flight tests.
The additional mass of the landers (two are actually used - the first one to land carries the fuel to take the astronaut back to lunar orbit). and Lunar orbit insertion increases the launch mass to at least half the capability of the Falcon 9.
I know that these promises are hard to believe, but in fact they primarily make use of lightweight mission concepts NASA extensively researched in past decades, but rejected in favor of less "austere" approaches.
We are finishing the welding on a batch of 14 of our bipropellant Liquid Fuel motors. These are not optimized for vacuum use, but are similar to what we will use to accelerate from LEO to Lunar Transfer, brake into Lunar orbit, and descend to the Moon. These motors will actually go into both level 1 and Level 2 “Northrup Grumman Lunar Lander competition” (NGLL) vehicles, and “Earth Launched” Space Diving demonstrators. These spaceflight simulations – on Earth – are more demanding that actual spaceflight due to the lower ISP in air, the greater thrust required with one G, and the faster control dynamics. (Other factors present in space are reduced or avoided.)
We have nearly 100 of our flight qualified, ultralight fuel tanks in stock. These lightweight high pressure tanks make the high mass ratio (and low empty weight) of our pressure fed rocket systems possible: without this factor, our projected missions would be impossible. Note that all our mass projections are based on measured systems mass, not theoretical predictions.
Our NGLL systems use four to ten of these fuel tanks. The Ten tanks hold up to 350 pounds of fuel, and (with less than 50 pounds system empty weight) this makes the landing of a 300 pound astronaut (with pressure suit and life support) on the Moon possible. This is our Crusader HTS (Human Transport System) configuration.
For the Google Lunar X PRIZE, we will cluster 30 fuel tanks (holding 1000 pounds of fuel) as a Lunar Transfer Stage in a Falcon 1 payload. ONE or TWO landers with reduced fuel load and rovers will be included. This cluster will mass 500 pounds and be able to land 150 pounds on the moon. With 50 pounds total empty weight, this will leave 100 pounds for rovers and other payload equipment.
Our original concept (before the Google Prize) was to offer a single lander with 100 pound payload. Standing seven feet tall on the Moon, and stabilized by locked landing legs, this could handle a drilling system for subsurface exploration on the Moon. After successfully pulling the drill stem and instruments from one bore hole, the lander could then restart its motors and hop to additional test locations. (Other instruments could of course analyze the surface close to the lander as well as analyze core samples.) Using the remnant of the Transfer bus as a lunar relay satellite, the system could link to landers at both the Lunar Poles, and Far-Side.
With the narrower focus of the Google competition, we prefer the concept of sending two lighter weight landers (same general size) to the Moon. With lightweight (30 pound) rovers, either could complete the required image collection and transmission. This increases the probability of success with a single Launch vehicle.
A very important alternative mission for these components is the Human circumlunar flight described above. Using the same Falcon 1, and 30 tank Lunar Transfer Stage, a human astronaut can be accelerated to a circumlunar, free return orbit. The 500 pound payload is sufficient for the traveler, life support, compact habitat and Earth reentry system. Micro-Space has many of these components in stock and in operation.
A Human lunar landing would require two Crusader HTS units (presumably successfully demonstrated by landing on the Moon in a Google effort), and much more fuel. The total mass for a solo flight of this type would be at least ½ the Falcon 9 payload. Although the primary components for this system are also in production at Micro-Space, space validation of the lander and orbital rendezvous systems are called for.
We are presently preparing for operational testing of both the lightweight and HTS landers for NGLL competitions, Google competition efforts and Human adventures. The fact that all three use very similar systems and that the major components of these systems are already operational and in production, makes our short time projections possible.
Bookmark/Search this post with:
I was wondering
if you might be willing to contact me privately... I wanted to ask you a few questions about the high-def video requirements and how your team is planning on fulfilling them. I tried to find an email to reach you at, but it didn't work. I'm a student working on my senior design project, with absolutely no intention of entering the GLXP. My email is baubin2@uiuc.edu. Thanks!